BS from GE2025: "We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong

[ironfeak]

BS from GE2025: "We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong

#GE2025: "We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong as he reached out to young Singaporeans and first-time voters in a video message.

He said that he wants to work with the young to take on challenges to come, and he sees many things that should be improved. https://str.sg/DYFU

Here are some potential "bullshit" or questionable aspects of the statement from PM Lawrence Wong in the #GE2025 context:

1. **Vague Promises** – "We hear you" and "I hear you" are classic political platitudes with no concrete plans or commitments. It’s easy to say but hard to verify if real action follows.

2. **Pandering to Young Voters** – Politicians often make broad appeals to youth and first-time voters during elections but may not follow through with meaningful policy changes afterward.

3. **Lack of Specifics** – Saying "many things should be improved" is intentionally vague. What exactly? Housing? Jobs? Climate policy? Without specifics, it’s just empty rhetoric.

4. **Election-Time Empathy** – Politicians suddenly "reach out" when they need votes. Where was this engagement outside of election season?

5. **"Work with the young" – Tokenism?** – Does this mean actual policy co-creation, or just symbolic gestures like youth forums that lead to little real change?

6. **Media-Managed Messaging** – A pre-recorded video is a controlled, one-way communication. Real engagement would involve unscripted Q&A or tangible policy discussions.

### Bottom Line:
It’s a typical election-season appeal—designed to sound empathetic and proactive, but the real test is whether it translates into **actionable policies** and **sustained engagement** beyond the campaign period.

Would you like a deeper breakdown of any of these points?

 

[ironfeak]

BS from GE2025: "We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong

#GE2025: "We hear you, I hear you," said PM Lawrence Wong as he reached out to young Singaporeans and first-time voters in a video message.

He said that he wants to work with the young to take on challenges to come, and he sees many things that should be improved. https://str.sg/DYFU

Here are some potential "bullshit" or questionable aspects of the statement from PM Lawrence Wong in the #GE2025 context:

1. **Vague Promises** – "We hear you" and "I hear you" are classic political platitudes with no concrete plans or commitments. It’s easy to say but hard to verify if real action follows.

2. **Pandering to Young Voters** – Politicians often make broad appeals to youth and first-time voters during elections but may not follow through with meaningful policy changes afterward.

3. **Lack of Specifics** – Saying "many things should be improved" is intentionally vague. What exactly? Housing? Jobs? Climate policy? Without specifics, it’s just empty rhetoric.

4. **Election-Time Empathy** – Politicians suddenly "reach out" when they need votes. Where was this engagement outside of election season?

5. **"Work with the young" – Tokenism?** – Does this mean actual policy co-creation, or just symbolic gestures like youth forums that lead to little real change?

6. **Media-Managed Messaging** – A pre-recorded video is a controlled, one-way communication. Real engagement would involve unscripted Q&A or tangible policy discussions.

### Bottom Line:
It’s a typical election-season appeal—designed to sound empathetic and proactive, but the real test is whether it translates into **actionable policies** and **sustained engagement** beyond the campaign period.

Would you like a deeper breakdown of any of these points?

Let’s **deepen the bullshit analysis** of PM Lawrence Wong’s statement—because political rhetoric deserves scrutiny. Here’s a breakdown of why this could be more fluff than substance:

---

### **1. "We Hear You" – The Illusion of Listening**
**Why it’s bullshit:**
- **No evidence of prior listening:** If the government truly "heard" young Singaporeans, where were the major policy shifts *before* election season?
- **No acknowledgment of past grievances:** Did they address existing youth concerns (e.g., cost of living, mental health, over-competition) *before* this video? Or is this just damage control?
- **Listening ≠ Changing:** Governments love to say they’re listening, but real listening means **policy adjustments**, not just PR.

**Question to ask:** *What specific feedback from young people has already led to policy changes?*

---

### **2. "Work With the Young" – Co-Option vs. Real Empowerment**
**Why it’s bullshit:**
- **Youth panels & token engagement:** Singapore has a history of state-sanctioned "youth dialogues" that are tightly controlled, with little impact on actual policymaking.
- **Who defines "working together"?** If the government sets the agenda, filters the participants, and controls the outcomes, is it real collaboration—or just performative inclusion?
- **No structural power shift:** Are young people being given real decision-making authority (e.g., in Parliament, ministries), or just invited to "give feedback" that gets ignored?

**Question to ask:** *Can you name one major policy in the last 5 years that was significantly altered due to youth input?*

---

### **3. "Take on Challenges to Come" – Vague, Non-Committal, Fear-Based**
**Why it’s bullshit:**
- **What challenges?** Climate change? AI disruption? Housing shortages? If he doesn’t name them, he can’t be held accountable for failing to address them.
- **Future-framing avoids present accountability:** Politicians love talking about "future challenges" because it distracts from **current failures** (e.g., cost of living, inequality).
- **No policy roadmap:** "We’ll work on it" is meaningless without a timeline, budget, or clear plan.

**Question to ask:** *What are the top 3 challenges for young Singaporeans, and what exact policies will you implement in your first year to address them?*

---

### **4. "Many Things Should Be Improved" – A Masterclass in Vagueness**
**Why it’s bullshit:**
- **Safe, non-controversial phrasing:** It’s a way to admit *something* is wrong without naming what, who’s responsible, or how it’ll be fixed.
- **Implies past failures, but no accountability:** If "many things" need improving, doesn’t that mean the current leadership (including Wong’s party) failed before?
- **No prioritization:** Is he talking about healthcare, education, LGBTQ+ rights, or something else? Without specifics, it’s just **political filler**.

**Question to ask:** *Name three policies your government got wrong in the last decade, and how you’ll fix them.*

---

### **5. The Medium: A Scripted Video, Not Real Engagement**
**Why it’s bullshit:**
- **One-way communication:** A pre-recorded message allows zero accountability—no tough questions, no pushback, no spontaneity.
- **Election-mode empathy:** If Wong really wanted to engage youth, why not host an **unscripted town hall** where he answers unfiltered questions?
- **Social media ≠ Governance:** A nice video doesn’t mean policy change. It’s **optics over action**.

**Question to ask:** *Will you commit to monthly unscripted dialogues with young voters if elected?*

---

### **Final Verdict: Bullshit Probability = High**
This is **classic political campaigning**:
**Safe, feel-good rhetoric** ("We hear you")
**Vague promises** ("Work together")
**No hard commitments** ("Improve things")
**Election-timed "empathy"** (Where was this energy last year?)

**Real test:** If Wong wins, will we see **concrete youth-driven policy shifts**, or will this fade into the usual post-election silence?

 

[singlion]

we have been harmed by vaccines. After all BS. Nothing to hear nothing to believe.

 

[singlion]

if u not vaccinated and think u safe? wolbachia will get u thr. the mosquitos' needles.
Already abt 80% tio-ed thr. various ways.

 

[Geneco]

need some advice who ish WE lololololol...

how to "WE" when ownself and usual suspects ish scared to update latest mRNA jabs lololololol...

 

[singlion]

Fauci and others got sued
www.vireslaw.group

 

[singlion]

Eversince Klaus swab came to Singapore and chan mali chan shoute siaSuay for rushing to buy toilet paper,
we have double down into Technocracy the science of social engineering one world gov.

All BS. after injecting poison jabs they continue.
Iran now warns US they can build the bom tomorrow under threats.

leader and a fatwa has to be issued

 

[singlion]

US food and drug safety

 

[singlion]

neighbourhood watch

 

[singlion]

Genetic modified Beings

 

[singlion]

Vaccinated are GMO/s,

 

[singlion]

SV40 enhancer has promoter region is extremely dangerous.

 

[singlion]

Genetically modified human beings,

 

[singlion]

In short they initially used the terrible inaccurate PCR to show false positives. Once they got the green light they switch method they use bacterias to mass produce the synthetic mRNA
containing spike protein genes, antibiotic resistance markers, and—surprise—extras like SV40 enhancers/promoters.
All intentional not careless contaminations. Plasmid DNA found in the shots. Not pieces of DNA or RNA

 

[singlion]

Blood-brain barrier
Brain function, behavior, and cognition following COVID-19 mRNA injection

The data raise concerns about long-term consequences, including continued cognitive decline, dementia, and neuropsychiatric morbidity and mortality. An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination is warranted.

 

[Geneco]

Cannot be cannot be lololololol

Need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about all the messages above.

Need some advice how to PM mods and others to mass report after report quota is maxed out lololololol

 

[singlion]

The singing dola and the US dola both devalued against gold and silver,

 

[singlion]

GMO Humans 'life expectancy reduced as much as 30ya.
Today due to wolbachia I went to buy mosquito coil.Those 'male' mosquitoes did suck blood. I was shocked to see the lady shopkeeper. She ages alot like a leaf turning yellow.
I knew she dying soon.

 

[singlion]

more than a third 37%,

 

[singlion]

USD falls against the singing dola singing dola falls against gold