Bullshit in it GE2025: No ‘gaps or drops’ in Marine Parade due to Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation, says Tan See Leng

I

ironfeak

Member
Feb 14, 2025
87
13
8
Bullshit in it GE2025: No ‘gaps or drops’ in Marine Parade due to Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation, says Tan See Leng
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...=internal_sharetool_androidphone_20042025_cna

### Potential Issues in the Article

1. **Claim of “No Gaps or Drops” in Service (Potentially Exaggerated or Subjective)**

- **What the Article Says**: Tan See Leng states there have been “no gaps or any drops” in the work done in Marine Parade GRC following Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation. He emphasizes that grassroots initiatives, like dental programs and food rescue activities, continued without disruption.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-no-gaps-or-drops-marine-parade-due-tan-chuan-jins-resignation-says-tan-see-leng-5076536)[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/spotlight-on-marine-parade-braddell-heights-pap-could-face-wp-nsp-in-3-cornered-fight-at-ge2025)

- **Why It’s Questionable**: This claim is bold and absolute, suggesting seamless continuity despite the loss of a key MP and former Speaker of Parliament. Tan Chuan-Jin was a prominent figure in Marine Parade, known for his responsiveness (e.g., addressing a resident’s concern about a dislodged brick in 2020). His sudden exit in 2023 due to an extramarital affair likely caused some disruption, at least in terms of resident trust or team dynamics. The article doesn’t provide concrete evidence (e.g., data on service delivery metrics or resident satisfaction surveys) to back the claim of zero impact. Residents interviewed in other sources expressed disappointment over Tan’s resignation, with some feeling it was a “personal indiscretion” but still valuing his contributions. This suggests at least an emotional or perceptual gap, even if logistical programs continued. Without measurable evidence, the claim feels like a political reassurance rather than a proven fact.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/marine-parade-stronghold-battleground-4963951)[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/marine-parade-stronghold-battleground-4963951)
- **BS Meter**: Moderate. It’s plausible that grassroots programs continued, but the absolute phrasing ignores potential intangible impacts like resident morale or trust, which are harder to quantify.

2. **Portrayal of the Current Team as “Trusted” and “Experienced” (Selective Framing)**

- **What the Article Says**: Tan See Leng describes the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC lineup as a “trusted team” with “experience in governance,” highlighting the roles of himself, Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim, Seah Kian Peng, Tin Pei Ling, and newcomer Diana Pang. Tin Pei Ling adds that the team is “connected to the ground” and understands Singaporeans.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-no-gaps-or-drops-marine-parade-due-tan-chuan-jins-resignation-says-tan-see-leng-5076536)

- **Why It’s Questionable**: This portrayal is optimistic and selectively positive, framing the team as cohesive and capable without acknowledging potential weaknesses. For instance, Diana Pang is a political newcomer, and her inclusion as part of a “trusted” team might overstate her untested status. Additionally, the team has faced significant changes: Tan Chuan-Jin’s exit, Edwin Tong’s shift to East Coast GRC, and Mohd Fahmi Aliman’s exclusion from the slate. These shifts could raise questions about stability or continuity, which the article glosses over. The claim of being “connected to the ground” is also subjective and lacks specific examples (e.g., resident feedback or specific initiatives led by each member). Other sources note that some residents in Marine Parade are waiting to evaluate the final slate of candidates before deciding, suggesting the team’s “trust” isn’t universal.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-pap-marine-parade-braddell-heights-5075806)[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-pap-marine-parade-braddell-heights-5075806)[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ge2025-tan-see-leng-to-helm-paps-marine-parade-braddell-heights-team-which-includes-new-face)

- **BS Meter**: Moderate. The framing is standard political rhetoric, but it omits challenges like team turnover or the unproven track record of new members, which could undermine the “trusted” label.

3. **Minimizing Tan Chuan-Jin’s Resignation as a “Pity” (Downplaying Impact)**

- **What the Article Says**: Tan See Leng calls Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation a “pity” but emphasizes that it didn’t lead to any service disruptions.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-no-gaps-or-drops-marine-parade-due-tan-chuan-jins-resignation-says-tan-see-leng-5076536)[](https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/ge2025-tan-see-leng-lead-pap-team-contest-marine-parade-braddell-heights-grc-edwin-tong)

- **Why It’s Questionable**: Describing a high-profile resignation as merely a “pity” downplays its significance. Tan Chuan-Jin’s exit in 2023 was a major scandal, involving an extramarital affair with another MP, Cheng Li Hui, and it shocked residents and political observers. Sources describe it as a “bolt from the blue” with a “deep impact” on Marine Parade residents, some of whom felt let down despite appreciating his work. The article doesn’t explore how this scandal might have affected voter sentiment or PAP’s reputation in a constituency where Tan was a well-regarded anchor MP. By focusing only on operational continuity, the article sidesteps the broader political and emotional fallout, which could be significant in a competitive election.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/marine-parade-stronghold-battleground-4963951)[](https://www.reddit.com/r/singapore/comments/1j0ztrq/ge2025_hot_spots_with_pap_facing_a_tan/)[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/marine-parade-stronghold-battleground-4963951)

- **BS Meter**: High. The understated language feels like a deliberate attempt to brush off a major controversy, ignoring its potential to influence voter perceptions in GE2025.

4. **Lack of Opposition Perspective (One-Sided Narrative)**

- **What the Article Says**: The article focuses heavily on PAP’s perspective, detailing Tan See Leng’s team, their initiatives, and their confidence in maintaining service levels. It briefly mentions that the Workers’ Party (WP) is expected to contest Marine Parade but provides no details on their candidates or campaign.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-no-gaps-or-drops-marine-parade-due-tan-chuan-jins-resignation-says-tan-see-leng-5076536)[](https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/ge2025-tan-see-leng-lead-pap-team-contest-marine-parade-braddell-heights-grc-edwin-tong)

- **Why It’s Questionable**: This imbalance creates a one-sided narrative that favors PAP’s claims without scrutiny. Marine Parade is noted as a potential hotspot for GE2025, with WP actively walking the ground since 2020 and fielding strong candidates like senior counsel Harpreet Singh. The article doesn’t mention WP’s efforts or resident sentiments toward the opposition, which could counterbalance PAP’s claims of seamless service. For example, other sources highlight WP’s growing presence and the possibility of a three-cornered fight with the National Solidarity Party, indicating a competitive race. By omitting this, the article implicitly bolsters PAP’s narrative while ignoring the broader electoral context.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-opposition-star-catches-candidates-credible-psp-wp-pap-5052136)[](https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapore/ge2025-tan-see-leng-introduces-potential-candidate-marine-parade-braddell-heights-grc)[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/spotlight-on-marine-parade-braddell-heights-pap-could-face-wp-nsp-in-3-cornered-fight-at-ge2025)

- **BS Meter**: Moderate. The omission isn’t a direct falsehood, but it skews the story by leaving out critical context about the opposition’s challenge, which could mislead readers about the constituency’s dynamics.

5. **Vague Future Plans Without Specifics (Fluffy Promises)**

- **What the Article Says**: Tan See Leng mentions “even more plans for the future” and seeks a “strong mandate” for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, referencing a five-year plan worth S$324 million announced earlier.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-no-gaps-or-drops-marine-parade-due-tan-chuan-jins-resignation-says-tan-see-leng-5076536)[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-marine-parade-water-play-park-sports-facilities-flying-fox-town-upgrades-plan-pap-5075476)

- **Why It’s Questionable**: The promise of “more plans” is vague and lacks detail in the article. While the S$324 million plan is cited, there’s no breakdown of key projects or how they address resident needs beyond general mentions of infrastructure and intergenerational connectivity. This lack of specificity is common in campaign rhetoric but can feel like empty posturing without concrete examples. Residents in other sources expressed concerns about national issues like immigration, which the article doesn’t tie to the team’s plans. Without clearer commitments, the claim risks being perceived as a generic appeal for votes rather than a substantive policy agenda.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-marine-parade-water-play-park-sports-facilities-flying-fox-town-upgrades-plan-pap-5075476)[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ge2025-tan-see-leng-to-helm-paps-marine-parade-braddell-heights-team-which-includes-new-face)[](https://www.reddit.com/r/singapore/comments/1j0ztrq/ge2025_hot_spots_with_pap_facing_a_tan/)

- **BS Meter**: Low to Moderate. It’s not outright false, but the vagueness reduces credibility, especially in a constituency where residents are
 
weighing tangible outcomes.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ge2025-grc-west-east-coast-marine-parade-aljunied-gerrymandering-ebrc-5000391)



### Summary

The article contains several elements that could be considered misleading or overly polished:

1. **Exaggerated claim of “no gaps or drops”** – Lacks evidence and ignores intangible impacts like resident trust.

2. **Selective portrayal of the team as “trusted”** – Overlooks turnover and untested members.

3. **Downplaying Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation** – Minimizes a major scandal’s political fallout.

4. **One-sided narrative** – Omits opposition context, skewing the electoral picture.

5. **Vague future plans** – Lacks specifics, risking empty campaign rhetoric.



These issues stem from a mix of political spin, selective framing, and lack of critical balance, which are common in election coverage but can obscure the full picture. If you want me to dig deeper into any specific point or cross-check resident sentiments on X, let me know!