There is no evidence linking the 187 food poisoning cases to the Total Defence Day ready-to-eat meals, investigations by SFA and MOH showed.
str.sg
The article states that there is no evidence linking the 187 food poisoning cases to the Total Defence Day ready-to-eat meals, based on investigations by the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) and the Ministry of Health (MOH).
### **Potential "Bullshit" (Issues to Question):**
1. **Lack of Transparency in Investigations**
- Were the investigations truly independent, or was there pressure to avoid implicating the meals (especially if they were part of a government-linked event like Total Defence Day)?
- What specific tests were conducted, and were all possible contaminants (bacteria, toxins, improper storage) ruled out?
2. **Coincidence vs. Causation**
- If 187 people got food poisoning around the same time they consumed these meals, is it really just a coincidence?
- Did the authorities consider other possible sources, or was this a quick dismissal to avoid bad publicity?
3. **Possible Conflict of Interest**
- If the meals were distributed as part of a national campaign, could there be bias in downplaying any link to avoid embarrassment or liability?
4. **Alternative Explanations Ignored?**
- Were other possible causes (e.g., water contamination, unrelated food sources) thoroughly investigated, or was the conclusion rushed?
5. **Public Trust Concerns**
- If past incidents (e.g., other food safety scandals) have been mishandled, people might doubt the official findings.
### **Conclusion:**
While the article presents an official stance, skepticism is reasonable—especially if the investigations lack detailed public reporting or if there’s a history of similar cases being underplayed. If people got sick after eating the meals, dismissing the link entirely without strong evidence could be seen as "bullshit."
No link found between food poisoning cases and Total Defence Day ready-to-eat meals: SFA, MOH
No food safety lapses were found, and investigations showed no foodborne pathogens. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read more at straitstimes.com.
The article states that there is no evidence linking the 187 food poisoning cases to the Total Defence Day ready-to-eat meals, based on investigations by the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) and the Ministry of Health (MOH).
### **Potential "Bullshit" (Issues to Question):**
1. **Lack of Transparency in Investigations**
- Were the investigations truly independent, or was there pressure to avoid implicating the meals (especially if they were part of a government-linked event like Total Defence Day)?
- What specific tests were conducted, and were all possible contaminants (bacteria, toxins, improper storage) ruled out?
2. **Coincidence vs. Causation**
- If 187 people got food poisoning around the same time they consumed these meals, is it really just a coincidence?
- Did the authorities consider other possible sources, or was this a quick dismissal to avoid bad publicity?
3. **Possible Conflict of Interest**
- If the meals were distributed as part of a national campaign, could there be bias in downplaying any link to avoid embarrassment or liability?
4. **Alternative Explanations Ignored?**
- Were other possible causes (e.g., water contamination, unrelated food sources) thoroughly investigated, or was the conclusion rushed?
5. **Public Trust Concerns**
- If past incidents (e.g., other food safety scandals) have been mishandled, people might doubt the official findings.
### **Conclusion:**
While the article presents an official stance, skepticism is reasonable—especially if the investigations lack detailed public reporting or if there’s a history of similar cases being underplayed. If people got sick after eating the meals, dismissing the link entirely without strong evidence could be seen as "bullshit."
